JAPANESE SUBGROUP ANALYSES FROM EMERGE AND ENGAGE, PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIALS OF ADUCANUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE

 

Y. Toda¹, T. Iwatsubo^2,3, Y. Nakamura⁴, N. Matsuda^1,†, M. Miyata¹, M. Jin¹, T. Chen⁵, K. Kuribayashi¹, Y. Tian^5,‡, R. Hughes⁵, J. Yamamoto¹, K.K. Muralidharan⁵, C. Rubel⁵, R.M. Hutchison⁵, S. Budd Haeberlein^6,‡

 

1. Biogen Japan Ltd., Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0027, Japan; 2. Unit for Early and Exploratory Clinical Development, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan; 3. Department of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan; 4. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kita-gun, Kagawa, 761-0793, Japan; 5. Biogen Inc., 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA; 6. Enigma Biomedical Group USA, TN, 37922, USA; †Denotes an author who was an employee of Biogen Japan Ltd at the time of this study and who has since left the company; ‡Denotes an author who was an employee of Biogen Inc. at the time of this study and who has since left the company.

Corresponding Author: Yasuo Toda, Biogen Japan Ltd., 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Email: yasuo.toda@biogen.com, Phone: +81-3-3275-2074, Fax: +81-3-3275-1920, ORCID: 0000-0002-8737-5256

J Prev Alz Dis 2024;5(11):1260-1269
Published online July 27, 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.106

 

---

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global prevalence and incidence of dementia continue to rise at a rapid rate. There is a need for new Alzheimer’s disease (AD) treatments globally. Aducanumab is a human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets aggregated soluble amyloid beta oligomers and insoluble amyloid beta fibrils. In June 2021, aducanumab was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of AD under the accelerated approval pathway.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy, safety, biomarker and pharmacokinetics (PK) of aducanumab in Japanese subgroups in EMERGE and ENGAGE studies.
DESIGN: EMERGE and ENGAGE were two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global, phase 3 studies of aducanumab in patients with early AD (mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD dementia).
SETTING: These studies involved 348 sites in 20 countries.
PARTICIPANTS: Participants enrolled in Japan included 121 (7.4% of total 1638 in EMERGE) and 100 (6.1% of total 1647 in ENGAGE) patients (aged 50–85 years with confirmed amyloid pathology) who met clinical criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to AD or mild AD dementia.
INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive aducanumab low dose (3 or 6 mg/kg target dose), high dose (6 or 10 mg/kg target dose) or placebo via IV infusion once every 4 weeks over 76 weeks.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to Week 78 on the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), an integrated scale that assesses both function and cognition. Other measures included safety assessments; secondary and tertiary clinical outcomes that assessed cognition, function, and behavior; biomarker endpoints (amyloid PET and plasma p-tau181); serum PK profiles and immunogenicity.
RESULTS: Results from the Japanese subgroup analyses were generally consistent with those of the overall study population across endpoints, while a lower mean body weight (kg) and a smaller proportion of ApoE ε4 carriers were observed in the Japanese subgroup population. A treatment effect was observed in favor of aducanumab on the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints at Week 78 in EMERGE, but not ENGAGE. The incidence and type of adverse events in the Japanese subgroups were generally comparable to those observed in the overall study population; amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were common treatment-related adverse events that appeared to be related to the aducanumab dose. ARIA incidence was generally lower in the Japanese subgroup compared with the overall population. Consistent with the overall data set, a robust dose-dependent decrease in amyloid beta levels as assessed with amyloid-PET and plasma p-tau181 was observed. Serum PK profiles and immunogenicity of aducanumab in Japanese population were consistent with the non-Japanese population.
CONCLUSION: Efficacy, safety, biomarker, and PK profiles of aducanumab were consistent between the Japanese subgroup and the overall population. A positive treatment effect of aducanumab on efficacy endpoints was observed in EMERGE, but not in ENGAGE.

Key words: Aducanumab, early Alzheimer’s disease, biomarker, amyloid beta, plasma p-tau181, PK, immunogenicity, Japan, subgroup analyses.

---

 

Introduction

Global prevalence and incidence of dementia continue to rise at a rapid rate. It is estimated that approximately 50 million people worldwide are affected by dementia, a number that is projected to triple by 2050 (1). Among the multiple etiologies, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia (2). These statistics also apply to Japan, one of the largest and fastest aging countries (3). The age-standardized number of Japanese individuals with AD and other dementia was approximately 3.5 million in 2016, which was a 17.8% increase from 1990 (4) and is projected to affect 20% (7 million) of older adults in Japan by 2025 (5). With no cure available to date, AD remains a burdensome disease in the US (2) as well as in Japan. For instance, ¥1.91 trillion ($14.8 billion USD) were spent in 2014 on dementia-related healthcare (6). Physical and emotional burdens also affect Japanese caregivers of patients including AD; caregivers of patients with AD or dementia in Japan experienced decreases in quality of life and work productivity and an increase in depression and anxiety compared with noncaregivers (7). Slowing of disease progression in AD by a disease modifying therapy is expected to enable patients with early AD to spend more time in earlier stages of AD and in the community, improve quality of life for patients and caregivers, and reduce community and residential care costs (8).
AD is a progressive disorder that is characterized by pathological deposits of amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau in the brain (2, 9). Considering a global need for new AD treatments (10), significant efforts have been made to develop therapies including anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody treatments that target underlying AD pathologies (11-15). Aducanumab is a human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets Aβ aggregates (14, 16, 17). EMERGE (NCT02484547) and ENGAGE (NCT02477800) were global Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of aducanumab in patients with early AD with confirmed amyloid pathology (18-20).
Final analyses were conducted on the Phase 3 EMERGE and ENGAGE data via the prespecified analysis plan and the final results have been reported (20). Briefly, EMERGE, but not ENGAGE, met its primary endpoint of reduced clinical decline with a significant treatment effect of high-dose aducanumab vs placebo that was (8)consistent across prespecified primary and secondary clinical endpoints (21). Furthermore, EMERGE and ENGAGE demonstrated a dose- and time-dependent reduction in biomarkers of AD pathophysiology (20). Based on the lowering of brain Aβ plaque levels assessed with amyloid-PET observed in clinical trials of aducanumab, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provided the approval to aducanumab on June 07, 2021 for the treatment of AD under accelerated pathway (16).
It remains unclear whether race or ethnicity contributes to AD prevalence (22). However, data from Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI) suggest that there may be racial or ethnic differences that contribute to prevalence and rates of disease progression. The J-ADNI study showed Japanese participants had a disease progression similar to the North American ADNI in the late stage of mild cognitive impairment, but it was milder than North American ADNI in mild AD participants (23). In addition, J-ADNI has a lower prevalence of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4 carrier status, a risk factor for AD, than North American ADNI as shown in previous report (23, 24). Given that participants in North America are often overrepresented in AD trials (25, 26), it is important to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD treatments in the Japanese population who are also affected by the human and economic burden of AD. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aducanumab in Japanese participants in EMERGE and ENGAGE relative to the overall study populations.

 

Methods

Participants

Inclusion criteria for EMERGE and ENGAGE are listed (20). Briefly, EMERGE and ENGAGE included patients with early AD who 1) met clinical criteria for either mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (27) or mild AD dementia (28), 2) were aged 50 to 85 years, 3) had a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)-Global score of 0.5, 4) had a Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) delayed memory index score ≤85, and 5) had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score between 24 and 30 (inclusive) (18-20). Participants were confirmed to be amyloid positive via amyloid positron emission tomography (PET; central visual read). Participants in Japan were enrolled across 27 sites (EMERGE) and 18 sites (ENGAGE).

Clinical study design

Details have been previously published (20). Briefly, randomization was stratified by study site and by apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4 carrier status (carrier vs noncarrier). Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive low-dose aducanumab (3 mg/kg [ApoE ε4+] or 6 mg/kg [ApoE ε4-]), high-dose aducanumab (6 mg/kg [ApoE ε4+] or 10 mg/kg [ApoE ε4-]), or placebo via intravenous infusion every 4 weeks. The implementation of protocol version 4 (PV4; approved on March 24, 2017) allowed ApoE ε4 carriers in the high-dose group to receive 10 mg/kg of aducanumab, which was an increase from 6 mg/kg pre-PV4. The treatment period for the Japanese study sites was from June 9, 2016, to July 31, 2019 (final follow-up visit) in EMERGE and from September 1, 2016, to July 31, 2019 (final follow-up visit) in ENGAGE.

Efficacy assessments

The efficacy outcomes included the primary endpoint (change from baseline in CDR-Sum of Boxes [SB] at Week 78) and secondary endpoints (change from baseline in MMSE, Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale-13 items [ADAS-Cog13], and Activities of Daily Living Inventory–Mild Cognitive Impairment version [ADCS-ADL-MCI] scores at Week 78) (20).

Safety assessments

A description of the safety assessments in EMERGE and ENGAGE, including methodology related to the monitoring, analyses, and management of amyloid related imaging abnormality (ARIA), have been reported (20, 29). Briefly, the safety and tolerability of aducanumab were assessed via (1) monitoring incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs); (2) assessing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (e.g., the incidence of ARIA-edema [E] and ARIA-hemorrhage [H] comprised of microhemorrhages, macrohemorrhages, or superficial siderosis); (3) monitoring clinically significant abnormalities and changes in vital signs, (4) tracking Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale results, and (5) monitoring incidence of anti-aducanumab antibodies in serum throughout the study period.

Biomarkers, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity

Cerebral amyloid plaque content was measured by amyloid PET imaging for eligibility and as part of a longitudinal biomarker substudy, as previously described (20, 30). Images were collected at baseline, Week 26 and Week 78. Multiple radioligands for Aβ PET have been approved for the detection of amyloid. Globally, EMERGE and ENGAGE trial sites used the 18F-florbetapir radioligand (31) for substudy imaging, however due to the its limited geographic availability in Japan at the start of the studies, the 18F-flutemetamol radioligand (32) was also included. Both tracers have been approved for the detection of amyloid in Japan. The Centiloid Scale approach was used to transform Aβ PET composite standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) derived from each PET radioligand to a common scale to enable pooling of results (33). The formulas used were: 100×((SUVR-1.0124))/0.4339 for 18F-florbetapir and 100×((SUVR-0.9593))/0.6170 for 18F-flutemetamol.
The effects of aducanumab treatment on plasma p-tau181 levels were analyzed using the Quanterix Simoa p-tau181 Advantage V2 kit at Frontage Laboratories’ (Exton, PA) CLIA laboratory. Data were captured by the Quanterix Simoa HD-X Analyzer as previously described (20,30). Serum PK profiles and immunogenicity of aducanumab were measured throughout the study using a validated assay.

Oversight

EMERGE and ENGAGE were carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and the International Council for Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guideline (ICH-GCP). The studies were approved by ethics committees or institutional review boards at each participating site in Japan. All patients provided written informed consent. An independent data monitoring committee reviewed ongoing safety and tolerability data throughout the course of the studies and reviewed futility analysis results.

Statistical analyses

Primary analyses on the primary, secondary, and amyloid PET endpoints for the Japanese subgroup were performed following the same prespecified mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) used for the overall population (19), except for the exclusion of region as a covariate. Forest plots of the efficacy results were presented to evaluate the consistency of the Japanese efficacy results with those of the overall population. Incidence was calculated by treatment group for AEs and SAEs in the Japanese subgroup. The statistical software, SAS®, was used for all summaries and analyses.

Availability of data and materials

While the data described in this article are not publicly available, the authors and Biogen are supportive of data sharing. Biogen has established processes to share protocols, clinical study reports, study-level data, and de-identified patient-level data. These data and materials will be made available to qualified scientific researchers in support of the objective(s) in their approved, methodologically sound research proposal. Proposals should be submitted through Vivli (https://vivli.org). To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data sharing agreement. For general inquiries, please contact datasharing@biogen.com. Biogen’s data-sharing policies and processes are detailed on the website www.biogentrialtransparency.com

 

Results

Disposition and baseline characteristics

A total of 121 (7.4% of total 1638 in EMERGE) and 100 (6.1% of total 1647 in ENGAGE) participants enrolled in Japan were randomized and received ≥1 dose of treatment during the placebo-controlled period. Participants who completed study were 23% (n=28) in EMERGE and 33% (n=33) in ENGAGE (Fig. 1). PV4 was approved on March 24, 2017 and implemented across global sites over approximately 18 months (20). In general, the enrollment for ENGAGE occurred ahead of that for EMERGE (Supplemental Fig. 1). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across EMERGE and ENGAGE and across treatment groups in the Japanese subgroup (Table 1). Subgroup participants were, by definition, participants enrolled in Japanese sites. All subgroup participants identified as Japanese for race. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics, including CDR-SB scores, were generally consistent between the overall population and the Japanese subgroup (Supplemental Table 1). Differences included a lower mean body weight (kg) and a smaller proportion of ApoE ε4 carriers in the Japanese subgroup compared with the overall population (Supplemental Table 1).

Abbreviation: ITT, intent-to-treat; OTC, opportunity to complete; PI, principal investigator. *This category contains discontinuation and withdrawal due to termination of the studies.

AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADAS-Cog13, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (13 items); ADCS-ADL-MCI, Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Inventory (Mild Cognitive Impairment version); ApoE, apolipoprotein E; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; CDR-SB, CDR–Sum of Boxes; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; PET, positron emission tomography; RBANS, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status; SD, standard deviation

 

Clinical efficacy

The number of participants analyzed at Week 26/50/78 were 119/79/27 in EMERGE and 95/78/33 in ENGAGE respectively. Consistent with the overall population, a positive treatment effect of high-dose aducanumab compared with placebo was observed on the primary endpoint, change from baseline in CDR-SB score at Week 78, in the EMERGE Japanese subgroup (–1.19 vs placebo [95% CI, –2.120 to –0.257]; Fig. 2A). A numerical advantage of aducanumab treatment on the primary endpoint was observed in the low-dose group (–0.56 vs placebo [95% CI, –1.567 to 0.442]).

ADAS-Cog13, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (13 items); ADCS-ADL-MCI, Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Inventory (Mild Cognitive Impairment version); CDR-SB, Clinical Dementia Rating CDR–Sum of Boxes; CI, confidence interval; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.

 

A positive treatment effect of high-dose aducanumab was also observed across the secondary endpoints in the EMERGE Japanese subgroup. High-dose aducanumab showed a numerical advantage in favor of aducanumab on change from baseline to Week 78 in MMSE (2.7 vs placebo [95% CI, 0.32 to 5.14]; Fig. 2B), ADAS-Cog13 (–5.731 vs placebo [95% CI, –9.6971 to –1.7657]; Fig. 2C), and ADCS-ADL-MCI (0.7 vs placebo [95% CI, –3.53 to 4.91]; Fig. 2D). Overall, the 95% CI of the low- and high-dose aducanumab arms were wide but contained point estimates for the EMERGE overall population in 3 out of 4 clinical endpoints, suggesting general consistency.
In the previously reported ENGAGE overall results (20), ENGAGE did not meet its primary or secondary endpoints. Consistent with this observation, no treatment effect was observed on the ENGAGE primary or secondary endpoints in the Japanese subgroup compared with placebo (Fig. 2E-H).

Amyloid PET imaging and plasma p-tau181 results

Amyloid PET images were collected longitudinally in a cohort of the Japanese subgroup as described in Methods (The number of data available at baseline/Week26/Week78 were 50/45/26 in EMERGE and 54/48/25 in ENGAGE respectively.). Consistent with the overall population (20), a dose- and time-dependent reduction in brain Aβ plaque levels was observed in each study compared with placebo (Fig. 3A, B). At Week 78, high-dose aducanumab decreased brain Aβ plaque levels (centiloid units) by –48.2 (95% CI, –63.1 to –33.2) in EMERGE (n=9) and –59.9 (95% CI, –75.0 to –44.7) in ENGAGE (n=6). In the low-dose arm, the difference from placebo in mean centiloid units at Week 78 was –35.1 (95% CI, –51.6 to –18.5) in EMERGE (n=7) and –25.8 (95% CI, –38.9 to –12.7) in ENGAGE (n=9).

Mean change from baseline of amyloid PET centiloid values in amyloid PET substudies of EMERGE (A) and ENGAGE (B). Error bars denote standard error. Mean change vs placebo of plasma p-tau181 levels (pg/ml) at Week 78 in the plasma p-tau181 analysis populations of EMERGE (C) and ENGAGE (D). PET, positron emission tomography; CI, confidence interval.

 

Plasma p-tau181 was assayed in available plasma samples from participants in the Japanese subgroup as part of the batched analysis of the overall study samples (EMERGE: n=18; ENGAGE: n=22). Consistent with the overall population (20), compared to placebo, reductions in plasma p-tau181 levels were observed at Week 78 in both high-and low-dose aducanumab arms in EMERGE (Fig. 3C) and ENGAGE (Fig. 3D). At Week 78, the difference in adjusted mean change from baseline between placebo and high-dose aducanumab was −0.842 (95% CI, −1.540 to −0.144) for EMERGE and −0.888 (95% CI, −2.342 to 0.566) for ENGAGE. In the low dose arm, the difference was −1.076 (95% CI, −1.974 to −0.178) for EMERGE and −0.967 (95% CI, −2.222 to 0.288) for ENGAGE.

Exposure to study treatment

Due to the termination of the studies on March 21, 2019, majority of the ITT population in the Japanese subgroups did not receive the full 78-week treatment. The mean study treatment duration was 58.89 weeks in EMERGE and 61.33 weeks in ENGAGE. Thirty-two participants (26.4%) in EMERGE and 37 participants (37.0%) in ENGAGE had the opportunity to complete (OTC) the Week 78 assessments prior to the futility announcement. In these participants, the mean (SD) cumulative dose received in the low-dose group was 51.8 mg/kg (21.58 mg/kg) in EMERGE (n=9) and 63.3 mg/kg (25.75 mg/kg) in ENGAGE (n=15), and in the high-dose group, 126.8 mg/kg (50.51 mg/kg) in EMERGE (n=13) and 119.4 mg/kg (47.28 mg/kg) in ENGAGE (n=10). The latter difference was a direct result of a greater mean (SD) number of 10 mg/kg doses received in EMERGE than in ENGAGE (10.5 [4.81] and 9.4 [4.77], respectively) (Supplemental Table 2).
The serum PK profiles of aducanumab were similar between the non-Japanese and the Japanese subgroup. As expected, mean trough serum concentrations of aducanumab generally increased in a dose-proportional manner from 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg after Week 24. Furthermore, in all aducanumab dose groups, serum aducanumab concentration reached a steady-state within the treatment period in both studies (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Safety

Safety findings in the Japanese subgroup were generally consistent with those of the overall population. The number of participants who experienced any AEs was comparable between the placebo and aducanumab groups (low- dose and high- dose) in each study (Table 2). The majority of participants experienced AEs with a maximum severity of mild (EMERGE, 55.0%-67.4%; ENGAGE, 47.4%-55.2%) or moderate (EMERGE, 16.3%-30.0%; ENGAGE, 24.1%-27.3%), and fewer participants experienced severe AEs (EMERGE, 2.5%-10.5%; ENGAGE, 0%-5.3%). The incidence of SAEs is listed in Table 2. There was no fatal AE that, in the opinion of the investigator, were considered treatment related.
The effects of long-term exposure to aducanumab on immunogenicity were low in Japanese participants. Specifically, in EMERGE, the incidence of treatment-emergent anti-aducanumab antibodies was low (placebo, 0/43 [0%]; low- dose, 1/37 [2.7%]; high- dose, 0/40 [0%]) and transient. Similarly, in ENGAGE, no treatment-emergent anti-aducanumab antibody incidence was observed. Common AEs (≥10% incidence) in EMERGE and ENGAGE that occurred more frequently in the aducanumab-treated patients were ARIA-E, ARIA-H, and fall. Compared with the overall population, the incidence of ARIA was lower in the Japanese subgroup (20, 29) and the incidence of ARIA-E was highest in the high-dose aducanumab group (Supplemental Table 3). Participants in the high-dose groups or who were ApoE ε4 carriers were generally observed to have a higher incidence of ARIA-E. Furthermore, ARIA-E was mostly asymptomatic (92.3% in EMERGE and 71.4% in ENGAGE).

*Was determined not related to study drug as assessed by the investigator. AE, adverse events, ARIA, amyloid related imaging abnormality; ARIA-E; ARIA-edema/effusion; ARIA-H, ARIA-microhaemorrhages and haemosiderin deposits, SAE, severe adverse events.

 

Discussion

The present subgroup analyses are the first to detail the clinical efficacy and safety of the anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody aducanumab in Japanese patients with early AD. Results were consistent with those of the EMERGE and ENGAGE overall population recruited in 20 countries (20). Specifically, a treatment effect in favor of high-dose aducanumab was observed across primary and secondary endpoints in EMERGE, whereas in ENGAGE, a treatment effect favoring aducanumab was not observed. Importantly, aducanumab treatment resulted in a robust dose- and time-dependent reduction in brain amyloid plaque burden in the Japanese subgroup in a manner comparable to results in the overall population in both studies.
Baseline demographics and disease characteristics of the Japanese subgroup were generally comparable to that of the overall population (20); however, a few expected differences were observed (Supplemental Table 1). Specifically, a smaller proportion of patients were ApoE ε4 carriers in the Japanese subgroups than in the overall population, consistent with previous reports (23, 24), while the difference in ApoE ε4 frequency in the present study requires cautious interpretation due to low sample size for each ApoE ε4 group (2 to 9 patients per group). In addition, the average body weight of the Japanese subgroup was lower than that of the overall population, in agreement with previous reports (26, 34-36). Still it is unlikely that these differences in baseline characteristics had an significant impact on the study results, considering the Japanese subgroup was generally consistent with the overall population in terms of baseline clinical scores.
Partial discordance was observed within the EMERGE and ENGAGE Japanese subgroup with respect to aducanumab clinical efficacy results; this partial discordance occurred in a similar manner in the overall population. Further context for this discordance and other potential contributing factors in the overall population are evaluated (21) and can be speculated similarly in the Japanese subgroup results.
As briefly discussed, one of the possible factors for the partial discordance seen between EMERGE and ENGAGE results in the overall data set was a difference in the proportion of patients who had full access to the 10 mg/kg dosing regimen; this discrepancy was due to the timing of PV4 implementation in EMERGE and ENGAGE, which allowed ApoE ε4 carriers to titrate up to 10 mg/kg aducanumab from 6 mg/kg (20). This difference in access to full dosing was also true for the Japanese subgroup (Supplemental Fig. 1). Indeed, the Japanese EMERGE high-dose group received a greater cumulative dose of aducanumab (average cumulative dose, 126.8 mg/kg) relative to the ENGAGE high-dose group (average cumulative dose, 119.4 mg/kg); this group also received an increased number of possible 10 mg/kg doses to full 14-dose regimen of 10 mg/kg (Supplemental Table 2). Therefore, differences in cumulative dose may also have contributed to the partial discordance in the EMERGE and ENGAGE results in the Japanese subgroups. However, the causes remain undetermined.
Consistent with results observed in the overall population, a dose- and time- dependent effect of aducanumab on brain Aβ plaque levels was observed in EMERGE and ENGAGE. However, in contrast to the overall population (20), reductions in amyloid PET (centiloid units) at Week 78 were numerically greater in the ENGAGE high-dose group (-59.9 CL) compared with the EMERGE high-dose group (-48.2 CL) Fig. 3A and 3B). This may be due to 1) a higher baseline amyloid in ENGAGE (92.0 CL) than EMERGE (71.0 CL) allowing for a greater degree of clearance amyloid to be achieved from baseline, and/or 2) the limited number of patients in the high-dose arm in the Japanese amyloid PET substudy (EMERGE, n=9; ENGAGE, n=6 at Week 78). Note that even though ENGAGE had more amyloid removal, the final amyloid load at Week 78 was still higher than EMERGE (ENGAGE 30.8 CL; EMERGE 26.6 CL). Whether these differences contributed to the partial discordance in aducanumab-induced Aβ reduction in the Japanese subgroup cannot be determined. In plasma p-tau181 substudy, consistent with overall data, aducanumab decreased plasma p-tau181 at Week 78 compared to placebo in both high- and low-dose in EMERGE and ENGAGE. Changes of plasma p-tau181 in the placebo arm of both studies are numerically higher in Japanese population compared to overall. Given the small sample size in the Japanese population in this study, confirmation of the longitudinal dynamics of plasma p-tau181 specifically in the Japanese population will be important in future studies.
Aducanumab was well tolerated, and the safety profile of the Japanese subgroup was generally comparable to that of the overall population (20). Specifically, the incidence of ARIA-E was highest in the high-dose aducanumab arms. Similar findings were observed previously in other studies of amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibodies (12, 15, 37-40). Compared with the overall EMERGE and ENGAGE high-dose groups, the incidence of ARIA-E was lower in the Japanese EMERGE and ENGAGE high-dose groups. One possible factor is the smaller percentage of ApoE ε4 carriers in the Japanese subgroup compared with the overall population. ARIA-E cases were more commonly observed in ApoE ε4 carriers than noncarriers (14, 15, 20, 40). Therefore, it is possible that the lower ApoE ε4 carriage rate in the Japanese subgroup may explain, at least in part, the lower incidence of ARIA-E in the Japanese subgroup vs the overall population. However, the incidence of ARIA in Japanese ApoE ε4 carriers (EMERGE, 20.0% [5 of 25 carriers]; ENGAGE, 20.8% [5 of 24 carriers]; Supplemental Table 3) is less than in ApoE ε4 carriers in the overall population (EMERGE, 43.1% [156 of 362 carriers]; ENGAGE, 42.1% [159 of 378 carriers]) (20), indicating there may be additional factors.
In summary, the results from the Japanese subgroups are generally consistent with the overall EMERGE and ENGAGE trial results. Importantly, the present findings suggest that high-dose aducanumab decreased brain Aβ plaque burden with an acceptable safety profile in Japanese patients. However, one of the limitations of the Japanese subgroup study was overall low sample sizes at Week 78 due to the early termination of EMERGE and ENGAGE (EMERGE, n=32 out of 121 [26.4% had opportunity to complete Week 78 assessments by the futility announcement]; ENGAGE, n=37 out of 100 [37.0% had opportunity to complete Week 78 assessments by the futility announcement]), which were largely due to the early termination of EMERGE and ENGAGE; therefore, results should be interpreted with caution. These data may serve as a foundation for fulfilling the global need for AD treatments and interventions, particularly in Japan and the larger region of Asia.

 

Funding: These studies were supported by Biogen Inc. and Biogen Japan Ltd. Biogen played a role in the design and conduct of the study as well as the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and Biogen authors played a role in the preparation of this manuscript. Medical writing support, under direction of the authors, was provided by Yoko Henderson, Ph.D., and Megan Allen, Ph.D. from Meditech Media, Ltd and was funded by Biogen.

Acknowledgments: We thank all patients and caregivers who participated as well as all investigators and site staff who assisted in the EMERGE and ENGAGE studies. We thank Akiko Mori, Ph.D. for editorial support in the development of this manuscript.

Author contributions: All authors made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data; critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content; approved the final version to be published; and are accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosures: YN did not receive any fees or special compensation from Biogen in return for authoring this publication. TC, YT, RH, KKM, CR and RMH are employees and shareholders of Biogen Inc. YT, MM, MJ, KK and JY are employees of Biogen Japan Ltd and shareholders of Biogen Inc. NM was an employee of Biogen Japan Ltd at the time of this study and has since left the company. SBH was an employee of Biogen Inc at the time of this study and has since left the company and is an employee of Enigma Biomedical Group USA.

Ethical standard: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Council for Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guideline and was approved by ethics committees or institutional review boards at each site. All patients provided written informed consent. An independent data monitoring committee was responsible for monitoring the conduct of the trials, assessing routine safety, and reviewing futility analysis results.

Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

 

References

1. Organization WH. Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia: WHO guidelines. 2019;
2. 2021 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. Mar 2021;17(3):327-406. doi:10.1002/alz.12328
3. Muramatsu N, Akiyama H. Japan: super-aging society preparing for the future. Gerontologist. Aug 2011;51(4):425-32. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr067
4. Collaborators GBDD. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. Jan 2019;18(1):88-106. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30403-4
5. Montgomery W, Ueda K, Jorgensen M, Stathis S, Cheng Y, Nakamura T. Epidemiology, associated burden, and current clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease in Japan. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;10:13-28. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S146788
6. Sado M, Ninomiya A, Shikimoto R, et al. The estimated cost of dementia in Japan, the most aged society in the world. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206508
7. Ohno S, Chen Y, Sakamaki H, Matsumaru N, Yoshino M, Tsukamoto K. Humanistic burden among caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia in Japan: a large-scale cross-sectional survey. J Med Econ. Jan-Dec 2021;24(1):181-192. doi:10.1080/13696998.2021.1877149
8. Igarashi A, Azuma MK, Zhang Q, et al. Predicting the Societal Value of Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease in Japan: A Patient-Level Simulation. Neurol Ther. Aug 2023;12(4):1133-1157. doi:10.1007/s40120-023-00492-7
9. Gotz J, Halliday G, Nisbet RM. Molecular Pathogenesis of the Tauopathies. Annu Rev Pathol. Jan 24 2019;14:239-261. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012936
10. Cummings JL, Morstorf T, Zhong K. Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(4):37. doi:10.1186/alzrt269
11. Logovinsky V, Satlin A, Lai R, et al. Safety and tolerability of BAN2401–a clinical study in Alzheimer’s disease with a protofibril selective Abeta antibody. Alzheimers Res Ther. Apr 6 2016;8(1):14. doi:10.1186/s13195-016-0181-2
12. Mintun MA, Lo AC, Duggan Evans C, et al. Donanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med. May 6 2021;384(18):1691-1704. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2100708
13. Selkoe DJ, Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. Jun 2016;8(6):595-608. doi:10.15252/emmm.201606210
14. Sevigny J, Chiao P, Bussiere T, et al. The antibody aducanumab reduces Abeta plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. Sep 1 2016;537(7618):50-6. doi:10.1038/nature19323
15. Tolar M, Abushakra S, Hey JA, Porsteinsson A, Sabbagh M. Aducanumab, gantenerumab, BAN2401, and ALZ-801-the first wave of amyloid-targeting drugs for Alzheimer’s disease with potential for near term approval. Alzheimers Res Ther. Aug 12 2020;12(1):95. doi:10.1186/s13195-020-00663-w
16. ADUHELM (aducanumab) [prescribing information]. Cambridge, MA: Biogen, Inc. 2021.
17. Linse S, Scheidt T, Bernfur K, et al. Kinetic fingerprints differentiate the mechanisms of action of anti-Abeta antibodies. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Dec 2020;27(12):1125-1133. doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0505-6
18. ClinicalTrials.gov. 221AD301 Phase 3 Study of Aducanumab (BIIB037) in Early Alzheimer’s Disease (ENGAGE) [NCT02477800]. Accessed April 21, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02477800
19. ClinicalTrials.gov. 221AD302 Phase 3 Study of Aducanumab (BIIB037) in Early Alzheimer’s Disease (EMERGE) [NCT02484547]. Accessed April 21, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02484547
20. Budd Haeberlein S, Aisen PS, Barkhof F, et al. Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies of Aducanumab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(2):197-210. doi:10.14283/jpad.2022.30
21. Mallinckrodt C, Tian Y, Aisen PS, et al. Investigating Partially Discordant Results in Phase 3 Studies of Aducanumab. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(2):171-177. doi:10.14283/jpad.2023.6
22. National Research Council (US) Panel on Race E, and Health in Later Life. Ethnic Differences in Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Anderson NB BR, Cohen B, editors, ed. Critical Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Late Life. National Academies Press (US); 2004:chap 4.
23. Iwatsubo T, Iwata A, Suzuki K, et al. Japanese and North American Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative studies: Harmonization for international trials. Alzheimers Dement. Aug 2018;14(8):1077-1087. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.03.009
24. Eto M, Watanabe K, Ishii K. A racial difference in apolipoprotein E allele frequencies between the Japanese and Caucasian populations. Clin Genet. Nov 1986;30(5):422-7. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1986.tb01901.x
25. Cummings J, Reynders R, Zhong K. Globalization of Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. Aug 17 2011;3(4):24. doi:10.1186/alzrt86
26. Grill JD, Raman R, Ernstrom K, et al. Comparing recruitment, retention, and safety reporting among geographic regions in multinational Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13195-015-0122-5
27. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. May 2011;7(3):270-9. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
28. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. May 2011;7(3):263-9. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
29. Salloway S, Chalkias S, Barkhof F, et al. Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in 2 Phase 3 Studies Evaluating Aducanumab in Patients With Early Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. Jan 1 2022;79(1):13-21. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4161
30. Sevigny J, Suhy J, Chiao P, et al. Amyloid PET Screening for Enrichment of Early-Stage Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trials: Experience in a Phase 1b Clinical Trial. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. Jan-Mar 2016;30(1):1-7. doi:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000144
31. Amyvid (Florbetapir F 18 Injection) [prescribing information]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly & Co. 2012.
32. VIZAMYL (flutemetamol F 18 injection) [prescribing information]. Dublin, OH: Cardinal Health. 2013.
33. Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, et al. The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement. Jan 2015;11(1):1-15 e1-4. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.003
34. Carpenter CL, Yan E, Chen S, et al. Body fat and body-mass index among a multiethnic sample of college-age men and women. J Obes. 2013;2013:790654. doi:10.1155/2013/790654
35. Kagawa M, Kerr D, Uchida H, Binns CW. Differences in the relationship between BMI and percentage body fat between Japanese and Australian-Caucasian young men. Br J Nutr. May 2006;95(5):1002-7. doi:10.1079/bjn20061745
36. Shai I, Jiang R, Manson JE, et al. Ethnicity, obesity, and risk of type 2 diabetes in women: a 20-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care. Jul 2006;29(7):1585-90. doi:10.2337/dc06-0057
37. Sperling R, Salloway S, Brooks DJ, et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in patients with Alzheimer’s disease treated with bapineuzumab: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol. Mar 2012;11(3):241-9. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70015-7
38. Ostrowitzki S, Lasser RA, Dorflinger E, et al. A phase III randomized trial of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. Dec 8 2017;9(1):95. doi:10.1186/s13195-017-0318-y
39. Salloway S, Sperling R, Fox NC, et al. Two phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. Jan 23 2014;370(4):322-33. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1304839
40. Sperling RA, Jack CR, Jr., Black SE, et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. Jul 2011;7(4):367-85. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2351

© The Authors 2024